Angiosarcoma gastrointestinal multifocal, con compromiso extenso de estómago, intestino delgado y colon. Reporte de un caso / Multifocal gastrointestinal angiosarcoma, with extensive gastric, small intestine and colon involvement. A case report

Introducción. El angiosarcoma es una neoplasia vascular originada a nivel del endotelio, de baja frecuencia, conocido por su agresividad y crecimiento acelerado. Alcanza solo el 1 al 2 % del total de los sarcomas. La presentación gastrointestinal es infrecuente y su incidencia es poco conocida debido al escaso reporte de casos en la literatura. Suele identificarse en etapas avanzadas debido a la dificultad del diagnóstico histopatológico por sus características morfológicas, siendo necesario aplicar tinciones especiales o estudio inmunohistoquímico. Caso clínico. Por su interés y singularidad, presentamos el caso de un paciente masculino de 54 años, quien consultó con hemorragia digestiva profusa, anemización y requerimiento de terapia transfusional. Resultados. Durante el proceso diagnóstico, en la endoscopia encontraron diversas lesiones multifocales que se extendían por gran parte del tracto gastrointestinal. El estudio histopatológico mostró angiosarcoma gastrointestinal. Discusión. El angiosarcoma del tracto gastrointestinal es extremadamente infrecuente, de difícil diagnóstico y bajas posibilidades de manejo curativo, con opciones terapéuticas limitadas, lo que configura un mal pronóstico a corto plazo

Introduction. Angiosarcoma is a vascular neoplasm originating from endothelial cells, known for its aggressiveness, accelerated growth and reduced frequency. Reach only 1 to 2% of total sarcomas. Gastrointestinal presentation is extremely rare, the true incidence is poorly known, due to the limited reports of this entity in the literature. It is usually identified in advanced stages in view of the difficulty of the histopathological diagnosis, attributable to its morphological characteristics, being necessary to apply special stains or immunohistochemical study. Case report. Due to their interest and uniqueness, we present the case of a 54-year-old male patient, who presented with a profuse gastrointestinal bleeding, anemia, and requirement for transfusion therapy. Results. The endoscopy detected several multifocal lesions that extended most of the gastrointestinal tract. The histopathological study showed gastrointestinal angiosarcoma. Discussion. Angiosarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract is extremely uncommon, difficult to diagnose and has low possibilities of curative management, with limited therapeutic options, which configures a poor prognosis in the short term

Complicaciones asociadas al reservorio ileal en colitis ulcerativa versus poliposis familiar adenomatosa: Impacto en la calidad de vida del paciente / Ileal reservoir-associated complications in ulcerative colitis versus familial adenomatous polyposis: Impact on patient quality of life

Antecedentes: La proctocolectomía con reservorio es el procedimiento quirúrgico de elección para los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa y poliposis adenomatosa familiar. Objetivos: Evaluar las complicaciones posoperatorias a largo plazo (1994-2019) en pacientes operados por poliposis familiar adenomatosa (PFA) y colitis ulcerativa (CU) y el grado de satisfacción con la intervención. Métodos: Estudio observacional basado en el análisis de una base de datos retrospectiva con seguimiento prospectivo en 115 pacientes consecutivos: 79 con CU y 36 con PFA. Se ha realizado el seguimiento de un total de 88 pacientes, 60 con CU y 28 con PFA. Resultados: Se evaluaron 48 varones (54,4%) con una edad media de 44,8 ± 10,6 años. Las indicaciones para la cirugía fueron enfermedad intratable en 54 pacientes (47%), displasia/cáncer en 43 (37%), sangrado severo en cuatro (4%) y perforación en tres (3%). Se realizó una proctectomía y mucosectomía del muñón rectal en 67 (76,1%), y una técnica de doble grapado en 21. Se realizó una ileostomía protectora en todos los pacientes con CU y PFA. No se encontraron diferencias en las complicaciones tempranas entre los dos grupos. Las complicaciones tardías mostraron una mayor tasa de reservoritis en los pacientes de la CU respecto a la PFA (44,9 vs. 14,3%, p = 0,001), con más reservoritis refractaria en el grupo de la CU (13,3 vs. 0%, p = 0,04) sin diferencias en cuanto a obstrucción intestinal, estenosis o fístulas anastomóticas. La satisfacción general y la adaptación se consideraron buenas en el 87% de los pacientes con CU y solo en el 57% del grupo de PFA (p < 0,01). Conclusiones: La proctocolectomía con reservorio ileal tiene una morbilidad y mortalidad comparables, excepto por la mayor tasa de reservoritis en los pacientes con antecedentes de CU, a pesar de esta contingencia hay una mejor calidad de vida y mayor aceptación de la cirugía en los pacientes con CU que en los pacientes con PFA.(AU)

Background: Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Objectives: To evaluate long-term postoperative complications (1994-2019) in patients operated for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and the degree of satisfaction with the procedure. Methods: Observational study based on the analysis of a retrospective database with prospective follow-up in 115 consecutive patients: 79 with UC and 36 with FAP. A total of 88 patients were followed up, 60 with UC and 28 with PFA. Results: 48 males (54.4%) with a mean age of 44.8 ± 10.6 years were evaluated. Indications for surgery were intractable disease in 54 patients (47%), dysplasia/cancer in 43 (37%), severe bleeding in 4 (4%) and perforation in 3 (3%). A proctectomy and mucosectomy of the rectal stump was performed in 67 (76.1%), and a double stapling technique in 21. A protective ileostomy was performed in all patients with UC and FAP. No differences were found in early complications between the two groups. Late complications showed a higher rate of reservoritis in UC patients compared to FAP (44.9 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.001), with more refractory reservoritis in the UC group (13.3 vs. 0%, p = 0.04) with no differences in bowel obstruction, strictures, or anastomotic fistulas. Overall satisfaction and adaptation were considered good in 87% of UC patients and only 57% in the FAP group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir has comparable morbidity and mortality, except for the higher rate of reservoritis in patients with a history of UC, despite this contingency there is a better quality of life and greater acceptance of surgery in UC patients than in FAP patients.(AU)

Ileal reservoir-associated complications in ulcerative colitis versus familial adenomatous polyposis: Impact on patient quality of life. / Complicaciones asociadas al reservorio ileal en colitis ulcerativa versus poliposis familiar adenomatosa: Impacto en la calidad de vida del paciente.

BACKGROUND: Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term postoperative complications (1994-2019) in patients operated for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and the degree of satisfaction with the procedure. METHODS: Observational study based on the analysis of a retrospective database with prospective follow-up in 115 consecutive patients: 79 with UC and 36 with FAP. A total of 88 patients were followed up, 60 with UC and 28 with PFA. RESULTS: 48 males (54.4%) with a mean age of 44.8 ± 10.6 years were evaluated. Indications for surgery were intractable disease in 54 patients (47%), dysplasia/cancer in 43 (37%), severe bleeding in 4 (4%) and perforation in 3 (3%). A proctectomy and mucosectomy of the rectal stump was performed in 67 (76.1%), and a double stapling technique in 21. A protective ileostomy was performed in all patients with UC and FAP. No differences were found in early complications between the two groups. Late complications showed a higher rate of reservoritis in UC patients compared to FAP (44.9 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.001), with more refractory reservoritis in the UC group (13.3 vs. 0%, p = 0.04) with no differences in bowel obstruction, strictures, or anastomotic fistulas. Overall satisfaction and adaptation were considered good in 87% of UC patients and only 57% in the FAP group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir has comparable morbidity and mortality, except for the higher rate of reservoritis in patients with a history of UC, despite this contingency there is a better quality of life and greater acceptance of surgery in UC patients than in FAP patients.

[Helicobacter pylori detection patterns and related injuries through Sydney Protocol in a population of Antioquia, Colombia]. / Patrones de detección de Helicobacter pylori y lesiones relacionadas mediante protocolo Sydney en una población de Antioquia, Colombia.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the endoscopies that met the Sydney protocol in a population of Antioquia had a greater detection of H. pylori and their associated lesions than the endoscopies that only took antrum samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective, cross-sectional and descriptive study. Adult patients undergoing upper endoscopy were included. Patients were divided into two groups depending on Sydney protocol compliance. The detection frequency was measured for H. pylori and premalignant lesions. RESULTS: 261 participants were included, 88 from which biopsies were taken with the Sydney protocol and 173 with biopsies taken exclusively from the gastric antrum. The main endoscopy indication was dyspepsia (35.6%). The detection of H. pylori, atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia was 36.4%, 19.3% and 20.5% respectively in the Sydney group, and 30.1%, 11.6% and 9.8% in the control group. In the Sydney group, the detection of H. pylori was higher in the antrum and body (26.1%) than in antrum (6.8%) or body (3.4%) separately. The detection of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia was higher in antrum only (10.2% and 11.4% respectively) than in antrum and body or body separately. CONCLUSIONS: The omission of the Sydney protocol reduces the detection of H. pylori, atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia by 9.4%, 29.4% and 27.7% respectively. The protocol must be implemented systematically in every gastrointestinal endoscopy center.